Engineer A Post-Submission Report Error Discovery
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/107#Engineer_A_Post-Submission_Report_Error_Discovery
Properties
Instance of
Post-SubmissionReportErrorDiscoveryState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-SubmissionReportErrorDiscoveryState
Active period
From the time Engineer A discovered the data inaccuracy through the time Engineer A advises Attorney X
Affected parties
Attorney X
Court or mediating authority
Defendant's attorney
Engineer A
Opposing party in litigation
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's discovery that the data underlying Engineer A's forensic report conclusions was inaccurate and that accurate data would produce materially different conclusions
Terminated by
Engineer A's affirmative disclosure to Attorney X of the data inaccuracy and its effect on conclusions
Triggering event
Engineer A's discovery that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that use of more accurate data would yield different conclusions, while Attorney X was in the middle of settlement negotiations
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
once Engineer A discovered that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that if the more accurate data had been used in his investigation, Engineer A's conclusions would be different, Engineer A had an affirmative obligation to step forward and immediately advise Attorney X.
Text references
Since Attorney X was in the middle of negotiations with the defendant's attorney, which may or may not have resulted in a settlement of the case, this was critically important information for Attorney X to have in his possession.
once Engineer A discovered that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that if the more accurate data had been used in his investigation, Engineer A's conclusions would be different, Engineer A had an affirmative obligation to step forward and immediately advise Attorney X.
TTL
@prefix case107: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/107#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case107:Engineer_A_Post-Submission_Report_Error_Discovery a proeth:Post-SubmissionReportErrorDiscoveryState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Post-Submission Report Error Discovery" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the time Engineer A discovered the data inaccuracy through the time Engineer A advises Attorney X" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Attorney X",
"Court or mediating authority",
"Defendant's attorney",
"Engineer A",
"Opposing party in litigation" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "107" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T23:33:30.283707+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "107" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T23:33:30.283707+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "once Engineer A discovered that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that if the more accurate data had been used in his investigation, Engineer A's conclusions would be different, Engineer A had an affirmative obligation to step forward and immediately advise Attorney X." ;
proeth:stateclass "Post-Submission Report Error Discovery State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's discovery that the data underlying Engineer A's forensic report conclusions was inaccurate and that accurate data would produce materially different conclusions" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A's affirmative disclosure to Attorney X of the data inaccuracy and its effect on conclusions" ;
proeth:textreferences "Since Attorney X was in the middle of negotiations with the defendant's attorney, which may or may not have resulted in a settlement of the case, this was critically important information for Attorney X to have in his possession.",
"once Engineer A discovered that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that if the more accurate data had been used in his investigation, Engineer A's conclusions would be different, Engineer A had an affirmative obligation to step forward and immediately advise Attorney X." ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's discovery that the data upon which Engineer A based his report conclusions was inaccurate and that use of more accurate data would yield different conclusions, while Attorney X was in the middle of settlement negotiations" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 107 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:51:16.283482"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 107 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
107
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T23:33:30.283707+00:00
First case
107
Generated
2026-02-27T23:33:30.283707+00:00
Attributed to
Case 107 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:51:16.283482
Generated by
ProEthica Case 107 Extraction