DP4
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/106#DP4
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision question
How should Engineer A assess the duration of her confidentiality obligation toward Company X's design information, and by what standard — if any — may she treat that obligation as having expired?
Focus
The duration and expiration of Engineer A's confidentiality obligation toward Company X's regulatory submissions, and what standard — if any — governs when that obligation may be treated as having lapsed.
Option1
Treat the confidentiality obligation as continuing indefinitely until Engineer A can affirmatively demonstrate — against a multi-factor standard assessing public domain entry, technological supersession, and commercial inertness — that Company X's design information no longer retains competitive sensitivity, placing the burden of proof on Engineer A rather than on the passage of time
Option2
Treat the confidentiality obligation as expiring after a defined cooling-off period — calibrated to the typical competitive lifecycle of facility design information in the relevant industry — after which Engineer A may exercise professional judgment about whether specific information retains sensitivity without bearing a formal burden of proof
Option3
Treat the confidentiality obligation as coextensive with the period during which Company X's approved facility design remains operationally active and commercially relevant, after which the information may be treated as part of Engineer A's general professional knowledge base without further restriction
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case106: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/106#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case106:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "How should Engineer A assess the duration of her confidentiality obligation toward Company X's design information, and by what standard — if any — may she treat that obligation as having expired?" ;
proeth:focus "The duration and expiration of Engineer A's confidentiality obligation toward Company X's regulatory submissions, and what standard — if any — governs when that obligation may be treated as having lapsed." ;
proeth:option1 "Treat the confidentiality obligation as continuing indefinitely until Engineer A can affirmatively demonstrate — against a multi-factor standard assessing public domain entry, technological supersession, and commercial inertness — that Company X's design information no longer retains competitive sensitivity, placing the burden of proof on Engineer A rather than on the passage of time" ;
proeth:option2 "Treat the confidentiality obligation as expiring after a defined cooling-off period — calibrated to the typical competitive lifecycle of facility design information in the relevant industry — after which Engineer A may exercise professional judgment about whether specific information retains sensitivity without bearing a formal burden of proof" ;
proeth:option3 "Treat the confidentiality obligation as coextensive with the period during which Company X's approved facility design remains operationally active and commercially relevant, after which the information may be treated as part of Engineer A's general professional knowledge base without further restriction" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T01:11:27.594977"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 106 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-28T01:11:27.594977
Generated by
ProEthica Case 106 Extraction