DP1
Individual
38cf3297
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/106#DP1
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision Question
Should Engineer A accept employment at Company Y, and if so, what obligations must she fulfill before accepting?
Focus
Engineer A's decision whether to accept employment at Company Y given her prior government access to Company X's confidential regulatory submissions, and what pre-employment obligations attach to that decision.
Option1
Accept the position at Company Y after proactively disclosing to Company Y — before acceptance — the nature, subject-matter domain, and scope of Engineer A's prior access to Company X's confidential regulatory submissions, framed in terms of what categories of information she cannot use rather than the substantive content of what she knows
Option2
Decline the position at Company Y entirely on the grounds that the competitive relationship between Company Y and Company X — combined with the depth and technical specificity of Engineer A's regulatory access — creates a conflict of interest too substantial to be managed through disclosure and confidentiality maintenance alone
Option3
Accept the position at Company Y and disclose the prior government access only if Company Y directly assigns Engineer A to work involving Company X's facility designs, treating the conflict as a matter to be managed reactively through project-level recusal rather than proactively through pre-employment disclosure
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_106: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/106> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/106#DP1> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP1" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
38cf329798b2ad4f...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-28T01:11:27.602464
Generated By
ProEthica Case 106 Extraction