Conflict of Interest Disclosure Evolution Principle Applied to BER Case 01-11 Precedent
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/105#Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Evolution_Principle_Applied_to_BER_Case_01-11_Precedent
Properties
Instance of
ConflictofInterestDisclosureEvolutionPrinciple
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestDisclosureEvolutionPrinciple
Applied to
WXY Engineers' dual role as city engineer and design contractor for City H in BER Case No. 01-11
Balancing with
Disclosure Insufficiency for Structural Conflict of Interest
Concrete expression
In BER Case No. 01-11, the Board applied the disclosure-and-management approach to permit WXY Engineers to serve as city engineer while also providing design services, subject to disclosure of further circumstances that could create conflicts — demonstrating the evolved standard that conflicts are manageable through disclosure when structurally avoidable
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Interpretation
The disclosure-and-management approach applies to manageable conflicts where self-review and evaluator-to-beneficiary problems are structurally avoided, distinguishing permissible dual roles from categorically prohibited ones
Invoked by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Tension resolution
Disclosure-and-management applies to BER Case No. 01-11 because self-review was structurally avoided; categorical prohibition applies in the instant case because self-review is structurally inevitable
Source Evidence
Source text
WXY would need to disclose further circumstances (e.g., private work in city, reviewing its own work) that could create the potential for a conflict of interest
Text references
In deciding that it would be ethical for Engineer A's firm, WXY Engineers, to serve as city engineer for City H, perform general consulting services, and also be under contract to provide specific design services, the Board determined that Engineer A and WXY Engineering had provided services to City H for many years
The Board also concluded that it would be ethical for Engineer A and his firm WXY to serve as city engineer for City H and perform general consulting services and design services on individual projects under circumstances where those services did not include reviewing the work of Engineer A's firm
WXY would need to disclose further circumstances (e.g., private work in city, reviewing its own work) that could create the potential for a conflict of interest
TTL
@prefix case105: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/105#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case105:Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Evolution_Principle_Applied_to_BER_Case_01-11_Precedent a proeth:ConflictofInterestDisclosureEvolutionPrinciple,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Conflict of Interest Disclosure Evolution Principle Applied to BER Case 01-11 Precedent" ;
proeth:appliedto "WXY Engineers' dual role as city engineer and design contractor for City H in BER Case No. 01-11" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Disclosure Insufficiency for Structural Conflict of Interest" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "In BER Case No. 01-11, the Board applied the disclosure-and-management approach to permit WXY Engineers to serve as city engineer while also providing design services, subject to disclosure of further circumstances that could create conflicts — demonstrating the evolved standard that conflicts are manageable through disclosure when structurally avoidable" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "105" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T08:37:40.867958+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "105" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T08:37:40.867958+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The disclosure-and-management approach applies to manageable conflicts where self-review and evaluator-to-beneficiary problems are structurally avoided, distinguishing permissible dual roles from categorically prohibited ones" ;
proeth:invokedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:principleclass "Conflict of Interest Disclosure Evolution Principle" ;
proeth:sourcetext "WXY would need to disclose further circumstances (e.g., private work in city, reviewing its own work) that could create the potential for a conflict of interest" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Disclosure-and-management applies to BER Case No. 01-11 because self-review was structurally avoided; categorical prohibition applies in the instant case because self-review is structurally inevitable" ;
proeth:textreferences "In deciding that it would be ethical for Engineer A's firm, WXY Engineers, to serve as city engineer for City H, perform general consulting services, and also be under contract to provide specific design services, the Board determined that Engineer A and WXY Engineering had provided services to City H for many years",
"The Board also concluded that it would be ethical for Engineer A and his firm WXY to serve as city engineer for City H and perform general consulting services and design services on individual projects under circumstances where those services did not include reviewing the work of Engineer A's firm",
"WXY would need to disclose further circumstances (e.g., private work in city, reviewing its own work) that could create the potential for a conflict of interest" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 105 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T08:46:32.092691"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 105 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
105
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T08:37:40.867958+00:00
First case
105
Generated
2026-02-28T08:37:40.867958+00:00
Attributed to
Case 105 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T08:46:32.092691
Generated by
ProEthica Case 105 Extraction