BER Case No. 01-11
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/105#BER_Case_No._01-11
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.97
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 01-11
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review as the primary analogical precedent, then distinguished on the self-review issue
Used in context
Cited as the most recent and directly analogous precedent, establishing that an engineering firm already under contract with a city may ethically serve as city engineer and perform design services, provided services do not include reviewing the firm's own work, and with disclosure of further conflict-creating circumstances; distinguished from the instant case because Engineer A's role would involve reviewing his own work
Version
2001
Source Evidence
Source text
More recently, in BER Case No. 01-11, Engineer A was the president of WXY Engineers, an engineering firm
Text references
In deciding that it would be ethical for Engineer A's firm, WXY Engineers, to serve as city engineer for City H, perform general consulting services, and also be under contract to provide specific design services
More recently, in BER Case No. 01-11, Engineer A was the president of WXY Engineers, an engineering firm
contrary to the situation in BER Case 01-11, the performance of such services by Engineer A potentially places him in the situation of reviewing his own work
TTL
@prefix case105: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/105#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case105:BER_Case_No._01-11 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER Case No. 01-11" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "105" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 01-11" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T08:29:55.919600+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "105" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T08:29:55.919600+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "More recently, in BER Case No. 01-11, Engineer A was the president of WXY Engineers, an engineering firm" ;
proeth:textreferences "In deciding that it would be ethical for Engineer A's firm, WXY Engineers, to serve as city engineer for City H, perform general consulting services, and also be under contract to provide specific design services",
"More recently, in BER Case No. 01-11, Engineer A was the president of WXY Engineers, an engineering firm",
"contrary to the situation in BER Case 01-11, the performance of such services by Engineer A potentially places him in the situation of reviewing his own work" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review as the primary analogical precedent, then distinguished on the self-review issue" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited as the most recent and directly analogous precedent, establishing that an engineering firm already under contract with a city may ethically serve as city engineer and perform design services, provided services do not include reviewing the firm's own work, and with disclosure of further conflict-creating circumstances; distinguished from the instant case because Engineer A's role would involve reviewing his own work" ;
proeth:version "2001" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 105 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T08:46:32.084404"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 105 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
105
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T08:29:55.919600+00:00
First case
105
Generated
2026-02-28T08:29:55.919600+00:00
Attributed to
Case 105 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T08:46:32.084404
Generated by
ProEthica Case 105 Extraction