Active-Employment Private Contract Negotiation Prohibition Violated by U.S. Agency Engineers
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/102#Active-Employment_Private_Contract_Negotiation_Prohibition_Violated_by_U.S._Agency_Engineers
Properties
Instance of
Active-EmploymentPrivateContractNegotiationProhibition
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Active-EmploymentPrivateContractNegotiationProhibition
Applied to
Conclusion of cooperative arrangement and corporate formation while still employed by U.S. Agency
Balancing with
At-Will Employment Symmetry and Engineer Mobility Right
Competitive Employment Freedom With Confidentiality Constraint
Concrete expression
The U.S. Agency engineers concluded binding negotiations with a private consulting firm and formed a corporation for a joint venture — all while still employed by the U.S. Agency — constituting the core violation of the prohibition on concluding private contracts during active public employment on the same project.
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Interpretation
The principle is violated at the point of concluded negotiations and corporate formation, not merely at the point of contract execution with the foreign government; the timing of resignation — 'at or about the time the negotiations with the foreign government were concluded' — confirms that the private contracting process was substantially complete before departure.
Invoked by
U.S. Agency Engineers Group
Tension resolution
The general right to seek private employment does not extend to concluding binding private contracts for work on the same project during active public employment; the principle draws the line at concluded negotiations, not at mere career exploration.
Source Evidence
Source text
Negotiations were finally concluded between this group and a firm of consulting engineers for a cooperative project to execute the work, and the group of employees formed a corporation to be a part of a joint venture to design the hydroelectric project.
Text references
At or about the time the negotiations with the foreign government were concluded, this group of engineers resigned their positions with the U.S. Agency and shortly thereafter entered into contract with the foreign government.
Negotiations were finally concluded between this group and a firm of consulting engineers for a cooperative project to execute the work, and the group of employees formed a corporation to be a part of a joint venture to design the hydroelectric project.
TTL
@prefix case102: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/102#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case102:Active-Employment_Private_Contract_Negotiation_Prohibition_Violated_by_U.S._Agency_Engineers a proeth:Active-EmploymentPrivateContractNegotiationProhibition,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Active-Employment Private Contract Negotiation Prohibition Violated by U.S. Agency Engineers" ;
proeth:appliedto "Conclusion of cooperative arrangement and corporate formation while still employed by U.S. Agency" ;
proeth:balancingwith "At-Will Employment Symmetry and Engineer Mobility Right",
"Competitive Employment Freedom With Confidentiality Constraint" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The U.S. Agency engineers concluded binding negotiations with a private consulting firm and formed a corporation for a joint venture — all while still employed by the U.S. Agency — constituting the core violation of the prohibition on concluding private contracts during active public employment on the same project." ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "102" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T16:08:17.013024+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "102" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T16:08:17.013024+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The principle is violated at the point of concluded negotiations and corporate formation, not merely at the point of contract execution with the foreign government; the timing of resignation — 'at or about the time the negotiations with the foreign government were concluded' — confirms that the private contracting process was substantially complete before departure." ;
proeth:invokedby "U.S. Agency Engineers Group" ;
proeth:principleclass "Active-Employment Private Contract Negotiation Prohibition" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Negotiations were finally concluded between this group and a firm of consulting engineers for a cooperative project to execute the work, and the group of employees formed a corporation to be a part of a joint venture to design the hydroelectric project." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The general right to seek private employment does not extend to concluding binding private contracts for work on the same project during active public employment; the principle draws the line at concluded negotiations, not at mere career exploration." ;
proeth:textreferences "At or about the time the negotiations with the foreign government were concluded, this group of engineers resigned their positions with the U.S. Agency and shortly thereafter entered into contract with the foreign government.",
"Negotiations were finally concluded between this group and a firm of consulting engineers for a cooperative project to execute the work, and the group of employees formed a corporation to be a part of a joint venture to design the hydroelectric project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 102 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T16:27:05.299089"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 102 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
102
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T16:08:17.013024+00:00
First case
102
Generated
2026-03-02T16:08:17.013024+00:00
Attributed to
Case 102 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T16:27:05.299089
Generated by
ProEthica Case 102 Extraction