Out-of-Scope-Safety-Finding-Reporting-Standard-Individual
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Out-of-Scope-Safety-Finding-Reporting-Standard-Individual
Properties
Instance of
Out-of-ScopeSafetyFindingReportingStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Out-of-ScopeSafetyFindingReportingStandard
Confidence
0.82
Created by
NSPE Code of Ethics and professional engineering practice norms
Document title
Out-of-Scope Safety Finding Reporting Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A when deciding whether to include the wall defect in his final report despite client objection
Used in context
Governs the specific threshold question of whether Engineer A, whose contracted scope is limited to pavement damage, has a professional obligation to formally document and report a safety-critical wall defect he incidentally observes, and whether a client's scope-limitation argument can justify suppression of such findings.
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A's scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge
Text references
Engineer A's scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge
although not part of the scope of services for which he was retained, Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall
asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
TTL
@prefix case100: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case100:Out-of-Scope-Safety-Finding-Reporting-Standard-Individual a proeth:Out-of-ScopeSafetyFindingReportingStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Out-of-Scope-Safety-Finding-Reporting-Standard-Individual" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Code of Ethics and professional engineering practice norms" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Out-of-Scope Safety Finding Reporting Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Out-of-Scope Safety Finding Reporting Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A's scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's scope of work is solely to identify any pavement damage on the bridge",
"although not part of the scope of services for which he was retained, Engineer A notices an apparent pre-existing defective condition in the wall",
"asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A when deciding whether to include the wall defect in his final report despite client objection" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs the specific threshold question of whether Engineer A, whose contracted scope is limited to pavement damage, has a professional obligation to formally document and report a safety-critical wall defect he incidentally observes, and whether a client's scope-limitation argument can justify suppression of such findings." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 100 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:56.171624"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 100 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
100
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
First case
100
Generated
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
Attributed to
Case 100 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:56.171624
Generated by
ProEthica Case 100 Extraction