Engineer A Wall Defect Field Notes Documentation for Future Reference
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Engineer_A_Wall_Defect_Field_Notes_Documentation_for_Future_Reference
Properties
Instance of
EngineeringNotesSafetyFindingWrittenReportPreservationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineeringNotesSafetyFindingWrittenReportPreservationObligation
Case context
Engineer A observed a wall defect potentially linked to a fatal accident; the Board affirmed that documenting the observation in field notes was appropriate and that those notes must be preserved for possible future reference.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (sub-consultant bridge inspector)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to document the wall defect observation in his engineering field notes for possible future reference, ensuring that the observation was preserved even though it was appropriately excluded from the formal report.
Temporal scope
At the time of the field observation and throughout the engagement
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Field Notes Integrity Preservation — Wall Defect Observation Must Not Be Altered
Source Evidence
Source text
While it may be appropriate for Engineer A to note such information in his field notes
Text references
While it may be appropriate for Engineer A to note such information in his field notes
the Board concludes that Engineer A did the appropriate thing in coming forward to his client with the information and also by documenting the information for possible future reference as appropriate.
TTL
@prefix case100: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case100:Engineer_A_Wall_Defect_Field_Notes_Documentation_for_Future_Reference a proeth:EngineeringNotesSafetyFindingWrittenReportPreservationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Wall Defect Field Notes Documentation for Future Reference" ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A observed a wall defect potentially linked to a fatal accident; the Board affirmed that documenting the observation in field notes was appropriate and that those notes must be preserved for possible future reference." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Field_Notes_Integrity_Preservation_—_Wall_Defect_Observation_Must_Not_Be_Altered> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:38:18.532149+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:38:18.532149+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (sub-consultant bridge inspector)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Engineering Notes Safety Finding Written Report Preservation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to document the wall defect observation in his engineering field notes for possible future reference, ensuring that the observation was preserved even though it was appropriately excluded from the formal report." ;
proeth:sourcetext "While it may be appropriate for Engineer A to note such information in his field notes" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of the field observation and throughout the engagement" ;
proeth:textreferences "While it may be appropriate for Engineer A to note such information in his field notes",
"the Board concludes that Engineer A did the appropriate thing in coming forward to his client with the information and also by documenting the information for possible future reference as appropriate." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 100 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:56.192818"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 100 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
100
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:38:18.532149+00:00
First case
100
Generated
2026-03-01T08:38:18.532149+00:00
Attributed to
Case 100 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:56.192818
Generated by
ProEthica Case 100 Extraction