Comparative Precedent Distinguishing — Present Case vs. Case No. 89-7

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Comparative_Precedent_Distinguishing_—_Present_Case_vs._Case_No._89-7
Properties
Instance of
ComparativeCasePrecedentDistinguishingState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ComparativeCasePrecedentDistinguishingState
Active period
Throughout the Board's deliberation on the present case
Affected parties
Client
Engineer A
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Public Agency
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Board's ethical analysis comparing the present case to NSPE Case No. 89-7 and Case No. 97-5
Terminated by
Board's conclusion that the present case is materially different on three key dimensions
Triggering event
Invocation of Case No. 89-7 as a potentially applicable precedent requiring distinction
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
the facts and circumstances in Case No. 89-7, while somewhat similar in nature, are significantly different than the facts in the present case

Text references
Also in Case No. 89-7, there was the possibility of a dangerous condition developing at some point in the future, while in the present case, loss of life had already occurred
First, it is clear that, unlike Case No. 89-7, which involved facts and circumstances that were openly conveyed directly to Engineer A from a client
the facts and circumstances in Case No. 89-7, while somewhat similar in nature, are significantly different than the facts in the present case
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Comparative_Precedent_Distinguishing_—_Present_Case_vs._Case_No._89-7> a proeth:ComparativeCasePrecedentDistinguishingState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Comparative Precedent Distinguishing — Present Case vs. Case No. 89-7" ; proeth:activeperiod "Throughout the Board's deliberation on the present case" ; proeth:affectedparties "Client", "Engineer A", "NSPE Board of Ethical Review", "Public Agency" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:discoveredincase "100" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:24:19.222847+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "100" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:24:19.222847+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "the facts and circumstances in Case No. 89-7, while somewhat similar in nature, are significantly different than the facts in the present case" ; proeth:stateclass "Comparative Case Precedent Distinguishing State" ; proeth:subject "Board's ethical analysis comparing the present case to NSPE Case No. 89-7 and Case No. 97-5" ; proeth:terminatedby "Board's conclusion that the present case is materially different on three key dimensions" ; proeth:textreferences "Also in Case No. 89-7, there was the possibility of a dangerous condition developing at some point in the future, while in the present case, loss of life had already occurred", "First, it is clear that, unlike Case No. 89-7, which involved facts and circumstances that were openly conveyed directly to Engineer A from a client", "the facts and circumstances in Case No. 89-7, while somewhat similar in nature, are significantly different than the facts in the present case" ; proeth:triggeringevent "Invocation of Case No. 89-7 as a potentially applicable precedent requiring distinction" ; proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 100 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:56.177788"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 100 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
100
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:24:19.222847+00:00
First case
100
Generated
2026-03-01T08:24:19.222847+00:00
Attributed to
Case 100 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:56.177788
Generated by
ProEthica Case 100 Extraction