Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Individual
5820d6f2
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Properties
Parent
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.91
Createdby
Professional engineering ethics norms
Documenttitle
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Usedby
Engineer A when evaluating whether to comply with client suppression request
Usedincontext
Decision framework for Engineer A to weigh his duty of loyalty to VWX (his client) and the public agency's instruction against his paramount obligation to protect public safety, given that the bridge wall defect may pose ongoing risk to the public.
Source Evidence
Source Text
asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
Text References
Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority
The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B
asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_100: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
5820d6f27504597b...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
100
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
First Case
100
Generated
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
Attributed To
Case 100 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:56.171485
Generated By
ProEthica Case 100 Extraction