Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework
Properties
Instance of
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Confidence
0.91
Created by
Professional engineering ethics norms
Document title
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A when evaluating whether to comply with client suppression request
Used in context
Decision framework for Engineer A to weigh his duty of loyalty to VWX (his client) and the public agency's instruction against his paramount obligation to protect public safety, given that the bridge wall defect may pose ongoing risk to the public.
Source Evidence
Source text
asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
Text references
Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority
The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B
asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work
TTL
@prefix case100: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/100#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case100:Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework a proeth:ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics norms" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "100" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:sourcetext "asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does not report this information to any other public agency or authority",
"The wall failed to restrain the vehicle, which fell to the river below, killing Police Officer B",
"asks Engineer A not to include this additional information in his final report since it was not part of his scope of work" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A when evaluating whether to comply with client suppression request" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Decision framework for Engineer A to weigh his duty of loyalty to VWX (his client) and the public agency's instruction against his paramount obligation to protect public safety, given that the bridge wall defect may pose ongoing risk to the public." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 100 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T08:48:56.171485"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 100 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
100
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
First case
100
Generated
2026-03-01T08:21:46.983063+00:00
Attributed to
Case 100 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T08:48:56.171485
Generated by
ProEthica Case 100 Extraction