Engineer D Absence of Revolving Door Contractual Constraint

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#Engineer_D_Absence_of_Revolving_Door_Contractual_Constraint
Properties
Instance of
ConflictofInterestState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestState
Active period
From the point of Engineer D's departure from City employment through ongoing association with AE&R's City-directed work
Affected parties
AE&R
City
Competing AE firms
Engineer D
Public
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer D's professional situation at the intersection of prior public authority and new private employment
Terminated by
Not yet terminated — absence of contractual restriction does not eliminate the ethical conflict
Triggering event
City's employment contracts for senior-level employees do not include revolving door provisions, leaving Engineer D without a formal contractual prohibition on joining a firm that benefited from their public authority
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Of significance is that the City does not include 'revolving door' provisions in employment contracts for its senior-level employees

Text references
Engineer D has been one of the City's main points of contact for AE firms and contractors in the area, both with respect to contract negotiation and award
Of significance is that the City does not include 'revolving door' provisions in employment contracts for its senior-level employees
TTL
@prefix case10: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case10:Engineer_D_Absence_of_Revolving_Door_Contractual_Constraint a proeth:ConflictofInterestState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer D Absence of Revolving Door Contractual Constraint" ; proeth:activeperiod "From the point of Engineer D's departure from City employment through ongoing association with AE&R's City-directed work" ; proeth:affectedparties "AE&R", "City", "Competing AE firms", "Engineer D", "Public" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:discoveredincase "10" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T20:26:12.628652+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "10" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T20:26:12.628652+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "Of significance is that the City does not include 'revolving door' provisions in employment contracts for its senior-level employees" ; proeth:stateclass "Conflict of Interest State" ; proeth:subject "Engineer D's professional situation at the intersection of prior public authority and new private employment" ; proeth:terminatedby "Not yet terminated — absence of contractual restriction does not eliminate the ethical conflict" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer D has been one of the City's main points of contact for AE firms and contractors in the area, both with respect to contract negotiation and award", "Of significance is that the City does not include 'revolving door' provisions in employment contracts for its senior-level employees" ; proeth:triggeringevent "City's employment contracts for senior-level employees do not include revolving door provisions, leaving Engineer D without a formal contractual prohibition on joining a firm that benefited from their public authority" ; proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 10 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:47:25.514954"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 10 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
10
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T20:26:12.628652+00:00
First case
10
Generated
2026-02-24T20:26:12.628652+00:00
Attributed to
Case 10 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:47:25.514954
Generated by
ProEthica Case 10 Extraction