DP1

Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#DP1
Properties
Instance of
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP1
Decision question
Should Engineer D accept employment at AE&R, and if so, under what conditions — including disclosure to the City, a voluntary cooling-off period, and conflict mitigation measures — given D's prior contracting authority over AE&R's City projects?
Focus
Engineer D's decision to accept employment at AE&R — a firm that benefited extensively from contracts awarded or supervised during D's tenure as City Engineer — without a formal revolving-door provision in place and without establishing adequate conflict mitigation measures prior to or upon acceptance.
Option1
Disclose employment negotiations to the City immediately upon their initiation, recuse from all AE&R-related contracting decisions during the negotiation period, seek the City's informed acceptance before finalizing employment, and voluntarily propose a cooling-off period from City-related work at AE&R regardless of contractual requirement
Option2
Accept employment at AE&R without disclosing negotiations to the City during the period of active contracting authority, and proceed to City-related work without establishing a voluntary cooling-off period or conflict mitigation measures
Role
Engineer D City Engineer
TTL
@prefix case10: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case10:DP1 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP1" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP1" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer D accept employment at AE&R, and if so, under what conditions — including disclosure to the City, a voluntary cooling-off period, and conflict mitigation measures — given D's prior contracting authority over AE&R's City projects?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer D's decision to accept employment at AE&R — a firm that benefited extensively from contracts awarded or supervised during D's tenure as City Engineer — without a formal revolving-door provision in place and without establishing adequate conflict mitigation measures prior to or upon acceptance." ; proeth:option1 "Disclose employment negotiations to the City immediately upon their initiation, recuse from all AE&R-related contracting decisions during the negotiation period, seek the City's informed acceptance before finalizing employment, and voluntarily propose a cooling-off period from City-related work at AE&R regardless of contractual requirement" ; proeth:option2 "Accept employment at AE&R without disclosing negotiations to the City during the period of active contracting authority, and proceed to City-related work without establishing a voluntary cooling-off period or conflict mitigation measures" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer D City Engineer" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T21:02:35.721845"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 10 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Generated
2026-02-24T21:02:35.721845
Generated by
ProEthica Case 10 Extraction