BER-Case-11-12
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#BER-Case-11-12
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.97
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 11-12
Importance
medium
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in analyzing conflict of interest in dual employment situations
Used in context
Precedent establishing that a part-time town engineer who participates in selecting and then terminating a consultant cannot ethically offer their own firm to perform the same work, due to conflict of interest under NSPE Code Section II.4.e regardless of procurement law compliance
Version
2011
Source Evidence
Source text
More recently, BER Case 11-12 considered the situation of Engineer A, who served as the part-time town engineer for Smithtown
Text references
Engineer A was not eligible to provide engineering services to Smithtown for the local road project
In determining it would not be ethical for Engineer A to offer and agree to perform the work for Smithtown
More recently, BER Case 11-12 considered the situation of Engineer A, who served as the part-time town engineer for Smithtown
This conclusion is based upon the language of Code Section II.4.e and is irrespective of whether the town's procurement laws were scrupulously followed
TTL
@prefix case10: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/10#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case10:BER-Case-11-12 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-11-12" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "10" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 11-12" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T20:28:11.805846+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "10" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T20:28:11.805846+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "More recently, BER Case 11-12 considered the situation of Engineer A, who served as the part-time town engineer for Smithtown" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A was not eligible to provide engineering services to Smithtown for the local road project",
"In determining it would not be ethical for Engineer A to offer and agree to perform the work for Smithtown",
"More recently, BER Case 11-12 considered the situation of Engineer A, who served as the part-time town engineer for Smithtown",
"This conclusion is based upon the language of Code Section II.4.e and is irrespective of whether the town's procurement laws were scrupulously followed" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in analyzing conflict of interest in dual employment situations" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Precedent establishing that a part-time town engineer who participates in selecting and then terminating a consultant cannot ethically offer their own firm to perform the same work, due to conflict of interest under NSPE Code Section II.4.e regardless of procurement law compliance" ;
proeth:version "2011" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 10 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T20:47:25.517489"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 10 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
10
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-24T20:28:11.805846+00:00
First case
10
Generated
2026-02-24T20:28:11.805846+00:00
Attributed to
Case 10 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T20:47:25.517489
Generated by
ProEthica Case 10 Extraction